"Inverse-Square Law #1" by Richard F. Yates

The Wikipedia definition of "Inverse-Square Law" (which you can read for yourself here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law ) is given as the following:

"The inverse-square law, in physics, is any physical law stating that a specified physical quantity or intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity."

My experiment, with my "Inverse-Square" works (I don't know how many I'll create---because I'm as predictable as Schrodinger's favorite kitty), is to see how much intensity an artwork loses (or perhaps GAINS) when it travels from its original context and point of creation into the etherwave soaked digital domain. The physics of this process are still fairly undefined! I'm hypothesizing that, unlike physical matter, mental-creative-psychic materials will not be as subject to dissipation or dilution, but may in fact GAIN in intensity through an injection of MYSTERY PARTICLES (which are what tends to grow, organically, around a creative work as soon as it begins to fly from its creator's BANG (big or small...)) and the work enters spreads across the digi-webs.

If my theory is correct, we'll see a slight PAISLEY shift when viewing these creations through digital devises, compared to their static forms, indicating that they are accelerating, thanks to MYSTERY PARTICLE fluxuation. (As defined in the classic work by Ono, Hanson, Paik, and Maciunas (1969)). If any other creative-scientists or inspired amateur art observers out there care to report their findings in this area, your data will be appreciated (and could contribute to the next paper I write for ART-SCIENCE-COGNITIVE INTERACTION MONTHLY... That's be neat, right?)

---Richard F. Yates (Primitive Thoughtician and Dr. of Holy Foolery)